Your Right to Make Bad Decisions Under New Jersey Law

Your Right to Make Bad Decisions Under New Jersey Law

by | Aug 11, 2026 | Estate Planning, Guardianship, Legal Bulletin, Living Will, NJ Supreme Court, Power of Attorney

A 2020 New Jersey Supreme Court decision, S.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC, 241 N.J. 257 (2020), raises a question that matters far beyond the personal injury lawsuit at its center: how much evidence does it take before a court can take away an adult's right to control her own affairs? The answer, the Court held, is a great deal — and the procedures required to get there are not optional.

The case is also a reminder of something that even lawyers sometimes forget - - you have the right to make what may seem like an objectively bad decision. A choice that looks unwise to a lawyer or a judge is not, by itself, evidence of incapacity.

What Happened to S.T.

S.T. was a forty-four-year-old chemical engineer, a Vietnamese refugee who had served in the U.S. Army and earned advanced degrees in engineering and environmental science. In 2008, she was struck on the head by a metal plate that fell from a doorway as she exited her office building in Bloomfield. The injury was serious. The Social Security Administration declared her permanently disabled within a year. Over the following years, she was diagnosed with post-concussion syndrome, major depressive disorder, cognitive impairment, and related conditions — all found to be permanent and causally related to the accident. She made more than 500 visits to healthcare providers.

She filed a personal injury lawsuit against the building owner and others. During the litigation, the defendants made an offer of judgment for $475,000. S.T. rejected it, against the advice of her attorney, who believed the offer was in her best interest given the challenges in proving her case.

Rather than accept her decision, S.T.'s own attorney filed a motion to have a guardian ad litem appointed to determine whether she had the mental capacity to make litigation decisions. He did not copy S.T. on the motion. The court appointed one without giving S.T. notice or a hearing. The guardian ad litem investigated, concluded S.T. lacked the capacity to decide whether to settle or go to trial, and was then granted the authority by the court to make that decision for her. A $625,000 settlement was reached — without S.T.'s consent. She appeared at the final hearing and objected forcefully, comparing the forced settlement to a life sentence. The court approved it anyway.

The Appellate Division affirmed. The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed.

Guardian Ad Litem vs. Legal Guardian: A Critical Distinction

The trial court's core mistake was treating the role of a legal guardian and guardian ad litem as interchangeable. They are not, and the difference is legally significant.

A legal guardian is appointed only after a court has formally adjudicated that a person is incapacitated — meaning impaired by mental illness or intellectual disability to the extent that the person "lacks sufficient capacity to govern himself and manage his affairs." N.J.S.A. 3B:1-2. That process requires a formal complaint, sworn affidavits from qualified medical professionals, at least twenty days' notice to the person, the right to independent counsel, and a hearing at which incapacity must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. Only then may a court appoint a guardian with the legal authority to make decisions on someone else's behalf. For more on how that process works, see Understanding Guardianship in New Jersey and What Happens After You're Appointed Guardian.

A guardian ad litem serves a fundamentally different and more limited function. When a person is alleged — not adjudicated — to be mentally incapacitated, a court may appoint a guardian ad litem to investigate the question and report back. The guardian ad litem acts, as the Court put it, as "the eyes of the court" — an independent investigator, not a decision-maker. The guardian ad litem's recommendations are not binding on the court, and the court cannot delegate its own fact-finding function to the guardian ad litem. The guardian ad litem's job is to advise the court whether a formal guardianship hearing under Rule 4:86 should proceed — not to replace the person's judgment in the meantime.

In S.T.'s case, the court skipped the adjudication entirely. It appointed a guardian ad litem, then immediately handed that person the authority to settle S.T.'s lawsuit over her objection — without ever holding the guardianship hearing that New Jersey law requires. The Supreme Court described this as the trial court "abdicating the Judiciary's nondelegable oversight and factfinding function" and "outsourcing to the guardian ad litem the role of final arbiter of S.T.'s capacity."

The Right to Make a Poor Decision

One of the most important principles running through the Supreme Court's opinion is the one the lower courts failed to apply: making a decision that others consider unwise is not, by itself, determinative of incapacity.

New Jersey law recognizes a clear public policy favoring the right of self-determination for all people. Competent people, the Court noted, "ordinarily can choose what they want, even when their choices are unwise or contrary to their best interests." The Rules of Professional Conduct require lawyers to abide by their client's decisions about the scope and objectives of representation — including the decision whether to settle a lawsuit. RPC 1.2(a). A lawsuit is a property right protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that right cannot be taken away without following the procedural safeguards the law demands.

The trial court judge told S.T. at the settlement hearing that she was "a very intelligent woman" but that "sometimes a little knowledge is dangerous" and that the mere fact that she wanted to reject a $625,000 offer was "troubling." The Supreme Court saw that reasoning for what it was: substituting the court's and counsel's judgment for the client's, without the legal authority to do so. As the Court observed, had S.T. not rejected the original $475,000 offer — the very rejection her attorney cited as evidence of her diminished capacity — an additional $150,000 would never have been placed on the table.

This same tension between protection and autonomy runs through all of New Jersey's guardianship law. Even in a formal guardianship proceeding, the Court has held that a family member cannot be bypassed without a plenary hearing and proper due process — and that the incapacitated person's own prior expressed wishes must be considered. See New Jersey Appellate Court Clarifies Judge’s Role in Guardianship Cases.

When Diminished Capacity Does Not Mean Incapacity

The Court did not rule that S.T. was definitely competent, or that her attorney was wrong to have concerns. It ruled that those concerns, however sincere, had to be tested through a proper legal process before they could justify overriding S.T.'s decisions. Diminished capacity — the standard her attorney described — is not the same as legal incapacity under New Jersey law. A person can process information slowly, struggle with complex tasks, or even make choices others consider irrational, and still retain the legal right to govern her own affairs.

The distinction matters in a range of contexts beyond personal injury litigation. A person without a formal guardian has the right to make their own financial decisions, their own medical decisions, and their own legal decisions — even ones that others in their life consider harmful. Until a court makes a formal finding of incapacity through the process New Jersey law requires, that person's autonomy is legally protected.

The lesson of S.T. is straightforward. Good intentions — whether those of an attorney, a family member, or a court — do not substitute for due process. The procedures New Jersey law requires before a person can be deprived of the right to manage her own affairs exist for a reason. They are not bureaucratic formalities. They are the line between protection and the loss of liberty.

Who Makes Decisions for a Spouse or Family Member During a Medical Emergency in New Jersey

Who Makes Decisions for a Spouse or Family Member During a Medical Emergency in New Jersey

by | Apr 21, 2026 | Estate Planning, Guardianship, Living Will, Power of Attorney

Your spouse is rushed to the hospital. The doctors need to make critical decisions about their treatment. Who has the legal right to make those decisions? Who has access to information? And what happens when adult children — or stepchildren — disagree with what you want?

These are not hypothetical questions. They play out in New Jersey hospitals and emergency rooms regularly, and the answers depend almost entirely on whether the incapacitated person planned ahead. This post explains the legal framework governing spousal rights in a medical emergency in New Jersey, and why the absence of proper documents can turn a medical crisis into a legal one.

The Fundamental Right to Control Your Own Medical Care

New Jersey law starts from a clear premise: every competent adult has a fundamental right to make their own health care decisions, including the right to refuse treatment. This right does not disappear simply because a person becomes ill or loses the ability to speak for themselves. The New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act, N.J.S.A. 26:2H-53 et seq., is built around the principle that a person’s documented wishes must be honored even when they can no longer communicate them directly.

The problem arises when a person loses decision-making capacity — whether temporarily due to a medical procedure, or permanently due to a stroke, dementia, or traumatic injury — and has not left clear instructions or designated someone to act on their behalf. In that vacuum, conflict among family members is not just possible. It is common.

Scenario 1: Your Spouse Has an Advance Directive

An Advance Directive is the umbrella term under New Jersey law for two related documents: a Proxy Directive (Healthcare Proxy or Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare), which designates a specific person to make medical decisions, and an Instruction Directive (Living Will), which sets out the patient’s specific wishes regarding treatment. The basics of Living Wills are covered in an earlier post: Understanding Living Wills: Why They Matter and How to Create One.

When a valid Advance Directive is in place and designates a Health Care Representative, that person — and that person alone — has legal authority to make medical decisions once the patient is determined to lack decision-making capacity. If the spouse is designated as the Health Care Representative, they have clear legal authority under N.J.S.A. 26:2H-61. Healthcare providers are required to treat the Health Care Representative’s decisions as if they came from the patient directly. Adult children, stepchildren, siblings, and other family members have no legal standing to override those decisions, regardless of how strongly they feel about the matter.

One critical note: under N.J.S.A. 26:2H-57(c), a designation of a spouse as Health Care Representative is automatically revoked upon divorce or legal separation. If your spouse’s Advance Directive was executed during a prior marriage and never updated, the former spouse no longer has authority — and there may be no designated representative at all.

Scenario 2: Your Spouse Has No Advance Directive

This is where the situation becomes significantly more complicated. When there is no Advance Directive, New Jersey does not have a formal statutory surrogate decision-making law that automatically grants the spouse legal authority to make medical decisions. Instead, the law operates through a combination of common practice, hospital or medical facility policy, and the general principles of the NJ Advance Directives Act.

In practice, New Jersey hospitals and healthcare providers follow a default hierarchy when a patient lacks both capacity and an Advance Directive. The spouse or domestic partner is generally treated as the presumptive decision-maker first, followed by adult children, then parents, then other next of kin. However, this default hierarchy is not codified as a rigid legal rule in the same way it is in some other states. It is a practical framework that healthcare providers follow, and it can break down when family members disagree — particularly when adult children from a prior relationship contest the spouse’s authority. When disputes are not resolved amicably, this often will lead to legal action.

When Children and Stepchildren Get Involved

This is the most emotionally charged and legally murky area of healthcare decision-making, and it arises more frequently in blended families than most people expect.

Consider a common scenario: a man remarries later in life. He has adult children from his first marriage who have a complicated relationship with his new wife. He is hospitalized following a stroke and cannot communicate his wishes. He has no Advance Directive. His wife believes he would not want aggressive intervention; his adult children disagree and want every available treatment pursued. Who wins?

Without an Advance Directive, there is no definitive legal answer under New Jersey law. In the absence of a designated Health Care Representative, N.J.S.A. 26:2H-64 provides that an Instruction Directive (Living Will) alone — without a named proxy — can guide treatment decisions. But if there is no document at all, the decision-making process defaults to the attending physician, guided by the patient’s known preferences, family input, and the hospital’s ethics committee if necessary.

Stepchildren have no automatic legal standing under New Jersey law to make healthcare decisions for a step-parent. Neither do biological children, for that matter, if a spouse has been designated as Health Care Representative. But in the absence of any legal designation, healthcare providers must navigate competing family voices without clear legal authority to resolve the dispute — which can result in delayed treatment, institutional ethics committee referrals, or in many cases, court-ordered guardianship.

How New Jersey Handles Family Disputes

The New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act contains a dispute resolution mechanism under N.J.S.A. 26:2H-66. When disagreements arise about a patient’s care — whether over the interpretation of an Advance Directive, the patient’s decision-making capacity, or the appropriate course of treatment — any interested party can invoke the dispute resolution process established by the healthcare institution. Most hospitals in New Jersey maintain ethics committees for exactly this purpose.

In cases where the dispute cannot be resolved through the hospital’s internal process, or where there is no appropriate decision-maker available, a court can intervene and appoint a guardian under New Jersey’s guardianship statutes. Guardianship proceedings in this context are filed in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, Probate Part, in the county where the incapacitated person resides.

For more on how guardianship works in New Jersey, see our post: Understanding Guardianship in New Jersey: Why It May Be Necessary and How to Obtain It.

A Note on HIPAA and Medical Information

Even before the question of decision-making authority arises, a spouse may face a more immediate obstacle: access to medical information. Under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), healthcare providers are prohibited from disclosing a patient’s medical information without authorization. In an emergency, providers will typically share information with a spouse as the presumptive next of kin. But in situations where family relationships are contested or communication is disrupted, a spouse may find themselves unable to get basic information about their partner’s condition.

A HIPAA authorization — a separate document designating who may receive medical information — can address this gap. Many comprehensive Advance Directive forms include one. If your spouse’s Advance Directive does not include a HIPAA authorization, it is worth asking your attorney about adding one.

What Every New Jersey Resident Should Do

The good news is that all of the scenarios described above are preventable with proper planning. Here are steps that everyone — especially people in blended families — should take:

  • A Proxy Directive (Healthcare Proxy): Designates a specific person to make medical decisions and eliminates any ambiguity about who is in charge. Should include an alternate designee in case the primary is unavailable.

  • An Instruction Directive (Living Will): Documents the patient’s specific wishes about life-sustaining treatment, artificial nutrition, resuscitation, and other critical decisions. Reduces the burden on the Health Care Representative and minimizes the grounds for family disputes.

  • A HIPAA Authorization: Ensures that designated individuals can receive medical information even in ambiguous situations.

  • A conversation with your family: Documents are only as effective as the communication surrounding them. Adult children — biological and step — should know what documents exist, how to access the originals, who is designated, and what the patient’s wishes are. Surprises at the hospital are often the root cause of conflict.

  • Regular review and updates: Advance Directives should be reviewed after major life events — a new marriage, a divorce, a serious diagnosis, or a change in the patient’s treatment preferences. A document executed ten years ago may no longer reflect current wishes or circumstances.

The State of New Jersey provides free Advance Directive forms through the New Jersey Department of Health. These are available at:

NJ Department of Health — Advance Directive Forms and FAQs.

While these forms are legally valid when properly filled out, signed and witnessed, they are not a substitute for individualized legal counsel — particularly for blended families, individuals with complex medical histories, or anyone whose family dynamics suggest the possibility of conflict.

Final Thoughts

A medical emergency is not the time to be resolving questions about who has legal authority to make decisions. By the time those questions arise, it is often too late to execute new documents, and the resulting disputes can cause lasting damage to family relationships on top of the medical crisis itself.

The rights of a spouse in a medical emergency are clear when proper documents are in place — and deeply uncertain when they are not. If you, your spouse or any adult family members have not yet executed Advance Directives, or if your existing documents are outdated, contact your attorney to schedule a consultation.







What Happens After You’re Appointed Guardian in New Jersey?

What Happens After You’re Appointed Guardian in New Jersey?

by | Mar 10, 2026 | Estate Planning, Guardianship, Living Will, Power of Attorney

If you’ve read my earlier post on Understanding Guardianship in New Jersey: Why It May Be Necessary and How to Obtain It, you already know that the guardianship process is a formal court proceeding with several important steps. But what happens once the court case is over and you are formally appointed guardian?

For many newly appointed guardians, that’s the most pressing question. The court proceeding is the beginning, not the end. Being a guardian in New Jersey carries ongoing legal duties, reporting requirements, and financial obligations that can last for years. This post breaks down what to expect.

1. Understand What Your Letters of Guardianship Authorize

Your Letters of Guardianship are the official document proving your legal authority to act on behalf of your ward. Banks, hospitals, government agencies, and other institutions will ask to see them. Keep multiple certified copies on hand — you will need them more than you expect.

Critically, your letters define the scope of your authority. As explained in my prior post on the types of guardianship available in New Jersey, the court may appoint a guardian of the person, a guardian of the property, or both. The Judgment of Incapacity and Guardian Appointment issued by the Court and the Letters of Guardianship issued by the County Surrogate will specify exactly what decisions you are authorized to make. Read them carefully and keep them accessible.

2. File an Initial Inventory of Property and Income

If you are the guardian of the property, you have a fiduciary duty to manage the ward’s financial affairs honestly and prudently. Within 90 days of your appointment, you must file an inventory listing all of the ward’s assets at the time of your appointment — bank accounts, real estate, investments, and personal property. This inventory is the baseline against which all future accountings will be measured.

3. Annual Accountings

The court has discretion to waive annual accountings, but very often, after the initial inventory, annual accountings are required detailing:

  • All income received on behalf of the ward (Social Security, pension, rental income, etc.)

  • All disbursements made (bills, care costs, medical expenses, etc.)

  • Current balances of all accounts and assets

  • Any changes to the ward’s asset portfolio

The level of detail required in the report will depend on the value of the estate. Estates valued at less than $1,000,000.00 can utilize the court’s EZ accounting form. Whatever the requirement, it is important to keep meticulous records throughout the year. Every receipt, bank statement, and bill paid should be documented. Sloppy recordkeeping is one of the most common reasons guardians face court scrutiny.

4. Annual Report of Well-Being

While this report can also be waived by the court, guardians are often required to file an annual Report of Well-Being. These reports update the court on the ward’s ongoing condition and the guardian’s activities on their behalf. Failing to file can result in court intervention and may jeopardize your status as guardian.

Annual reports typically address:

  • Current living arrangements and any changes made during the year

  • Medical and psychiatric treatment received

  • Social and recreational activities

  • The ward’s current mental and physical condition

  • Whether the guardianship should continue, be modified, or be terminated

  • Status of public benefits and social services

5. Court Approval Before Making Major Financial Decisions

As guardian of the property, you cannot simply do whatever you think is best with the ward’s assets. Certain actions typically require prior court approval, including:

  • Selling, mortgaging, or transferring real estate

  • Making gifts from the ward’s assets (even to family members)

  • Making large or unusual expenditures

  • Entering into significant contracts on behalf of the ward

  • Medicaid planning strategies involving asset transfers

When in doubt, consult your attorney before acting. Unauthorized financial decisions can expose you to personal liability and removal as guardian.

6. Always Act in the Ward’s Best Interest

This is the most fundamental obligation of every guardian: every decision you make must be in the best interest of your ward — not your own convenience, financial benefit, or the preferences of other family members. This fiduciary duty applies whether you are making healthcare decisions or managing finances.

New Jersey courts also require guardians to give weight to the ward’s previously expressed wishes — particularly around medical care, living arrangements, and end-of-life preferences. Document any known preferences your ward expressed before losing capacity.

7. Know When Guardianship Can Be Modified or Terminated

Guardianship is not always permanent. A ward may recover capacity, partially or fully, in which case the court can modify or terminate the guardianship. As guardian, you have an obligation to notify the court if your ward’s condition improves to the point where full guardianship may no longer be appropriate.

Guardianship also ends automatically upon the ward’s death. At that point, the ward’s estate passes according to their Will or, if none exists, New Jersey’s intestacy laws — and the executor or administrator of the estate takes over.

Final Thoughts

Seeking to be appointed guardian is often an act of love and obligation — but it is also a legal role that carries real responsibility. The court will continue to oversee your actions for as long as the guardianship remains in place. Stay on top of your reporting deadlines, keep thorough records, and never hesitate to reach out to an elder law attorney when a decision feels uncertain.

If you haven’t yet started the guardianship process, start with our earlier post: Understanding Guardianship in New Jersey: Why It May Be Necessary and How to Obtain It. And if you have questions about your obligations as a newly appointed guardian, consult your attorney.

Understanding Living Wills: Why They Matter and How to Create One

Understanding Living Wills: Why They Matter and How to Create One

by | Jan 10, 2025 | Estate Planning, Living Will

Estate planning is not just planning for death – it’s also planning for incapacity. A Living Will is an essential planning tool everyone needs to ensure that their medical wishes are honored if they ever become unable to communicate them. Here is a short summary of Living Wills, their importance, and how to create one in the New Jersey.

What Is a Living Will?

A Living Will, also known as an Advance Directive, is a legal document that outlines your wishes regarding medical care and end-of-life treatment. It comes into effect if you become incapacitated and unable to express your preferences. A Living Will can specify decisions about life-sustaining treatments, resuscitation efforts, artificial nutrition, and other critical interventions.

Why Is a Living Will Important?

  1. Ensures Your Wishes Are Honored: A Living Will gives you control over your medical care, even when you cannot speak for yourself.

  2. Avoid Conflict and Reduce Stress on Loved Ones: Without a Living Will, family members may face difficult decisions about your care. A clear document can ease their emotional burden and prevent potential conflicts.

  3. Provides Guidance to Healthcare Providers: Medical professionals are bound to follow your instructions as stated in a legally valid Living Will.

How to Create a Living Will in New Jersey

Creating a living will in New Jersey is straightforward but requires careful consideration. Follow these steps to ensure your living will is valid and reflects your intentions:

  1. Understand State Requirements: In New Jersey, a living will must comply with the New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act, N.J.S.A. 26:2H-53. The document must be in writing, signed by you, and either notarized or witnessed by two adults.

  2. Reflect on Your Preferences: Think about your values, beliefs, and medical treatment preferences. Consider consulting with your doctor to understand the implications of different medical interventions.

  3. Appoint a Healthcare Proxy: You can designate a Healthcare Proxy (also called a Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare) to make decisions on your behalf if you're unable to do so. This person should be someone you trust to respect your wishes.

  4. Draft the Document: Be clear and specific about your wishes to avoid ambiguity. In most instances an attorney will draft your Living Will along with a Durable Power of Attorney, and Last Will and Testament as part of a typical Estate Planning package. However, if you just want a Living Will and are looking for a free or low cost option, use a template specific to your state. The New Jersey Commission on Legal and Ethical Problems in the Delivery of Health Care, has developed free forms that are available here. The website Five Wishes also provides very lost cost options for individuals throughout the country here.

  5. Sign and Formalize the Document: Sign the document in the presence of a notary public or two witnesses. Witnesses cannot be your healthcare proxy or anyone directly involved in your care such as your doctor.

  6. Distribute Copies: Share copies of your living will with your Healthcare Proxy, family members, and primary care physician. Keep the original in a safe but accessible location.

  7. Review and Update Regularly: Life circumstances and medical advancements may change your preferences. Review your living will periodically and make updates as needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can I change my Living Will? Yes, you can update or revoke your living will at any time, as long as you are mentally competent. Be sure to inform everyone who has a copy of the document about the changes.

2. What happens if I don’t have a Living Will? Without a Living Will, medical decisions may be made by your family members or healthcare providers based on what they believe is in your best interest. This can lead to stress and potential disagreements.

3. Is a Living Will the same as a Last Will and Testament? No, a Living Will addresses healthcare decisions during your lifetime, while a Last Will and Testament outlines the distribution of your assets after death.

Final Thoughts

A Living Will is a powerful tool to ensure your medical wishes are respected and to provide peace of mind for you and your loved ones. In New Jersey, the process of creating a Living Will is straightforward and accessible. It is also one of the few legal documents you can obtain for free and complete on your own. By taking the time to prepare this document, you can take control of your future care and alleviate potential challenges for your family.

Start planning today by consulting with a legal professional or using reliable resources to draft your Living Will. It’s a small step that can make a big difference during a difficult time.