by Jose D. Roman | Jan 26, 2025 | Estate Administration, Estate Planning, Last Will and Testament, Probate
When it comes to estate planning, creating a Will is one of the most important steps you can take to ensure your assets are distributed according to your wishes. However, many people are unsure about whether they need to register their Will in New Jersey. Here’s what you need to know.
Is Registration Required in New Jersey?
In New Jersey, you are not required to register your Will during your lifetime. Unlike some legal documents, a Will does not need to be filed or recorded with a government office until after the testator’s death (the testator is the person who created the Will). Until that time, your will is a private document that you can store wherever you choose.
What Happens After Death?
After the testator passes away, the original Will must be submitted to the Surrogate’s Court in the county where the deceased person resided. This is why it is important to let your loved ones know how to find your Will. This process is called probate. During probate, the court validates the Will and grants the Executor (the person named in the Will to carry out its instructions) the authority to manage the estate.
New Jersey’s Voluntary Will Registry
New Jersey law, specifically N.J.S.A. §3B:3-2.1, requires the Secretary of State to maintain a Will Registry. The registry is a voluntary service where individuals can record the location of their Will and the contact information of the person who holds it. It is important to note that the registry does not store the actual Will—only information about where it can be found. This service can help Executors and family members locate the Will after the testator’s death, avoiding delays and complications. To register a Will, you must complete a registration form and pay a small fee. The registration information is confidential and accessible only to authorized individuals after the testator’s death.
Benefits of Storing Your Will Safely
Although registering your will is not mandatory, it’s crucial to ensure the document is safely stored and easily accessible to your Executor. Some popular options for storing your Will include:
- Home Safes: A fireproof and waterproof safe at home can protect your Will from damage. Make sure someone you trust knows the combination or where to find the key.
- Attorney’s Office: Many estate planning attorneys will hold onto the original copy of your Will for safekeeping.
Final Thoughts
If your Will is lost or destroyed and no one can produce the original, the court may presume it was intentionally revoked. This can complicate matters for your heirs and lead to disputes. To avoid this, let your Executor or a trusted loved one know where your original Will is stored and consider utilizing the voluntary Will Registry.
Estate planning can feel overwhelming, but taking steps to protect your Will provides peace of mind for you and your loved ones. If you have questions about drafting or storing your Will, consult an experienced estate planning attorney who can guide you through the process.
by Jose D. Roman | Jan 25, 2025 | Consumer Advocacy, Legal Bulletin, NJ Supreme Court
On January 9, 2025, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a decision addressing whether the state’s old Tax Sale Law (before it was amended in 2024) violated the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause by allowing the forfeiture of surplus equity from tax foreclosures without just compensation. In an opinion by Chief Justice Stuart Rabner, in 257-261 20th Avenue Realty, LLC v. Alessandro Roberto (A-29-23) (088959) the Court found the prior version of the Tax Sale Law to be unconstitutional. Relying on the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in Tyler v. Hennepin County, the Court held that property owners in New Jersey have a recognized right to surplus equity—the value of a property beyond the amount owed in taxes. The ruling clarified that private lienholders, acting jointly with municipalities to enforce tax foreclosures, are considered state actors subject to the requirements of the Takings Clause of the US Constitution.
Background of the Case
The case arose from a Paterson, NJ property owner’s failure to pay three sewer tax bills totaling just $606.00. The City of Paterson placed tax liens on the property, which were purchased by 257-261 20th Avenue Realty, LLC at a public auction. Years later, the company filed for foreclosure, and the property owner failed to respond, resulting in a judgment of foreclosure.
The property owner subsequently sought to vacate the judgment, arguing that the property —valued at over $500,000.00 — held significant equity vital for his retirement. He had invested $200,000.00 in improvements and had set aside $50,000.00 to pay the judgment. Despite these circumstances, the foreclosure judgment transferred the entire property, including its substantial surplus equity, to the lienholder without compensating the property owner for the value exceeding the tax debt.
The trial court vacated the judgment under NJ Court Rule 4:50-1(f), finding exceptional circumstances, and the Appellate Division affirmed, citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Tyler v. Hennepin County (2023), which held that forfeiture of surplus equity in tax foreclosures violates the Takings Clause.
Key Issues Addressed by the NJ Supreme Court
- Takings Clause and Surplus Equity: The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits the government from taking private property for public use without just compensation. The NJ Supreme Court, relying on Tyler, held that surplus equity—the value of the property exceeding the tax debt—is a protected property right. The pre-2024 Tax Sale L allowed the complete forfeiture of surplus equity to lienholders, a practice deemed unconstitutional.
- Lienholders as State Actors: The Court rejected the argument that private lienholders are not state actors and thus not subject to the Takings Clause. Tax foreclosure involves a public function—collecting taxes—and relies on a statutory framework created by the state. The Court determined that the collaboration between municipalities and lienholders renders the latter state actors for constitutional purposes.
- Public vs. Private Use: The Court dismissed the contention that the taking of surplus equity was not for public use. The Tax Sale serves a public purpose by enabling municipalities to collect taxes. However, the US Constitution requires that property taken for public use must be accompanied by just compensation, which the pre-2024 TSL failed to provide.
Significance of the Tyler Precedent
The NJ Supreme Court’s decision heavily relied on the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in Tyler v. Hennepin County. In Tyler, the Court held that a Minnesota tax foreclosure law allowing the forfeiture of surplus equity was unconstitutional. Similarly, the NJ Supreme Court found that property owners in New Jersey have a recognized right to surplus equity under both state and federal law. As Tyler is binding precedent, the NJ Supreme Court clarified that it did not need to rely on Rule 4:50-1(f)to vacate the foreclosure judgment but instead resolved the case on constitutional grounds.
Impact on Tax Foreclosure in New Jersey
This ruling has profound implications for New Jersey’s tax foreclosure system. Property owners now have a constitutionally recognized right to retain surplus equity in foreclosure proceedings. Municipalities and lienholders cannot confiscate more value than is necessary to satisfy the tax debt. This is a clear shift toward greater accountability and fairness in tax foreclosure practices. It is a major win for the average New Jersey property owner.
by Jose D. Roman | Jan 23, 2025 | Guardianship, Legal Bulletin, NJ Supreme Court
On December 11, 2024, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its opinion for In the Matter of A.D., (A-30/31-23) (088942) addressing whether court-appointed attorneys and temporary guardians are entitled to fee awards from Adult Protective Services (APS) when an incapacitated person’s estate lacks sufficient funds. The Court held that fee awards are not available.
Case Overview
The case originated in June 2020, when the Sussex County Division of Social Services, Office of Adult Protective Services (APS), sought a plenary guardianship for “Hank,” an alleged incapacitated person. The court appointed Steven J. Kossup, Esq. to represent Hank and Brian C. Lundquist, Esq. as temporary guardian. Both attorneys took significant steps to stabilize Hank’s life, ensuring he had stable housing, financial aid, and medical care. Despite APS’s recommendation for a permanent plenary guardian, Kossup and Lundquist advocated for a limited guardianship. Their position was supported by an expert psychologist, retained at Lundquist’s expense, who opined that Hank required only a limited guardianship. The trial court ultimately agreed. Kossup and Lundquist then applied for compensation for their services, seeking to have their fees paid by APS, as Hank’s estate lacked sufficient funds. While APS did not contest the amount of the fees, it argued that paying such fees would compromise its ability to serve its clients. The trial court and the Appellate Division denied the fee applications, prompting an appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Supreme Court’s Analysis
In a unanimous opinion, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed the denial of the fee applications. The decision emphasized the following key points:
1. The American Rule and Limited Exceptions
New Jersey adheres to the “American Rule,” which requires litigants to bear their own legal costs unless explicitly authorized by statute or court rule. New Jersey Court Rule 4:42-9(a) provides eight exceptions to the rule, two of which were invoked in this case:
- Statutory Authorization: The Court found that neither the Adult Protective Services Act (APS Act) nor the statutes governing guardianships authorize fee awards against APS. Both statutes limit fee awards to the estate of the incapacitated person.
- Guardianship Rules: Rule 4:42-9(a)(3) and Rule 4:86-4(e) permit fees to be paid from the incapacitated person’s estate or “in such other manner as the court shall direct.” However, the Court clarified that this language does not authorize fee awards against APS.
2. Rejection of the DiNoia Precedent
The Court explicitly declined to adopt the holding in In re Guardianship of DiNoia (2019), where the Appellate Division upheld a fee award against APS. The court in DiNoia ordered APS to pay counsel fees because APS had “protracted the litigation” by failing to provide information in a timely manner, and court-appointed attorney made exceptional efforts on behalf of his client. The Supreme Court held that such reasoning does not align with the American Rule or the governing statutes and rules, and ruled that there is no basis to authorize fee awards against APS under any circumstances, even if it protracted litigation.
3. Pro Bono Service
The Court highlighted the longstanding tradition of pro bono service in guardianship matters, particularly when the incapacitated person’s estate lacks resources. It acknowledged the substantial burden this places on attorneys and urged trial courts to consider the equitable distribution of these assignments.
Practical Guidance for Future Cases
The Court offered several recommendations for handling guardianship matters:
- Clear Communication: Judges should inform attorneys and guardians at the outset if their service is expected to be pro bono.
- Court Oversight: Judges, not Surrogates, are responsible for appointing counsel, determining the need for temporary guardians, and addressing compensation.
- Expert Fees: Temporary guardians serving pro bono should consult the court before retaining experts, ensuring funds are available to cover fees.
Broader Implications
The ruling in In the Matter of A.D. establishes that APS providers cannot be held financially responsible for court-appointed attorney fees, even if APS causes delay and the need for the attorney to perform extraordinary work on the case. While this reinforces the American Rule, it raises questions about the sustainability of pro bono service in guardianship cases, especially given the increasing demand for such legal representation. The Court expressed gratitude for the exemplary work of Kossup and Lundquist but acknowledged the need for systemic changes to address the burdens of pro bono service. This may include increased funding for legal aid programs or other measures to ensure fair allocation of responsibilities. As the population continues to age and demand for guardianship services grow, the legal community and policymakers must work together to ensure equitable and sustainable solutions.
by Jose D. Roman | Jan 22, 2025 | Estate Administration, Estate Planning, Intestate Estate (No Will), Last Will and Testament, Probate
Death is not a topic many of us like to dwell on, but planning for the inevitable is essential to ensure that your hard-earned money and assets are distributed according to your wishes. One question that often arises is: what happens if you die without a Will? Specifically, does your money automatically go to the government?
The short answer is no—your money does not automatically go to the government if you die without a Will. However, the distribution of your assets Will depend on the intestacy laws of your state. If you reside in New Jersey, understanding its intestacy laws is crucial.
What Happens if You Die Without a Will in New Jersey?
In legal terms, dying without a Will is known as dying “intestate.” When this happens, New Jersey’s intestacy laws come into play. These laws dictate how your estate Will be divided among your heirs, and the process generally aims to distribute your assets to your closest living relatives.
Here’s a breakdown of how New Jersey’s intestacy laws work:
1. If You Have a Surviving Spouse
The surviving spouse’s share depends on whether you have children or other close relatives:
- No children or parents: If you leave behind only a spouse and no descendants (children, grandchildren, etc.) or parents, your spouse inherits everything.
- With children from your marriage: If all your children are also the children of your surviving spouse, your spouse inherits everything.
- With children from another relationship: If you have children who are not the children of your surviving spouse, your spouse inherits the first 25% of your estate (but not less than $50,000 or more than $200,000.00), plus half of the remaining estate. The rest is divided among your children.
- With parents but no children: If you leave behind a spouse and parents but no children, your spouse inherits the first 25% of your estate (but not less than $50,000 or more than $200,000.00), plus 3/4 of the remaining estate. The rest goes to your parents.
2. If You Don’t Have a Surviving Spouse
If you are not married or your spouse has predeceased you, your assets are distributed as follows:
- To your children, in equal shares.
- If you have no children, to your parents.
- If your parents are deceased, to your siblings.
- If you have no siblings, to your nieces and nephews.
- If none of the above relatives are alive, the estate Will be distributed to more distant relatives.
3. When the Government Steps In
Only if you die without a Will and have no living relatives does your estate “escheat” to the state. In New Jersey, this is an extremely rare occurrence. The state government is considered the last resort for inheritance when absolutely no relatives can be located.
Non-Probate Assets
Not all assets go through probate or are governed by intestacy laws or your Will. Some assets, known as non-probate assets, pass directly to beneficiaries outside the probate process. These include:
- Jointly Owned Property: Assets held in joint tenancy or tenancy by the entirety automatically pass to the surviving owner.
- Beneficiary Designations: Accounts like life insurance policies, retirement accounts (e.g., 401(k) or IRAs), and payable-on-death (POD) or transfer-on-death (TOD) accounts pass directly to the named beneficiaries (assuming you have completed these forms).
- Trust Assets: Property held in a trust is distributed according to the terms of the trust and bypasses probate.
It’s important to keep beneficiary designations up to date and coordinate these with your overall estate plan. Even if you have a Will, these non-probate assets will not be subject to its terms unless the estate is named as a beneficiary.
Why You Should Have a Will
While New Jersey’s intestacy laws are designed to ensure that your estate passes to your family, this may not align with your specific wishes. For example:
- You may want to leave a larger share to a particular family member.
- You might wish to include friends, charities, or other beneficiaries who are not covered under intestacy laws.
- If you have minor children, you can appoint a guardian for them in your Will.
- You can also name an Executor to manage your estate, reducing potential conflict among family members.
Without a Will, the probate process can also be more complicated and time-consuming for your loved ones.
Final Thoughts
To ensure your assets are distributed according to your wishes and to simplify the process for your loved ones, it’s essential to create a Will. Consulting with an estate planning attorney can help you navigate the complexities of New Jersey’s intestacy laws and tailor a plan that fits your unique situation.
While your money generally Will not go to the government if you die without a Will, relying on state laws to determine the fate of your estate leaves much to chance. Taking the time to draft a Will is one of the most thoughtful and impactful gifts you can leave behind for those you care about.
by Jose D. Roman | Jan 21, 2025 | Estate Administration, Medicaid, Medicaid Estate Recovery
Medicaid provides crucial health coverage for individuals and families with limited income and resources, as well as people who require long-term nursing care. However, many recipients and their families may not realize that Medicaid is often entitled to be paid back after the recipient dies. Let’s talk about Medicaid Estate Recovery in New Jersey.
What Is Medicaid Estate Recovery?
Medicaid Estate Recovery is a federal requirement that obligates states to recover the costs of certain Medicaid benefits paid on behalf of a recipient after their death. This means that New Jersey’s Medicaid program may seek reimbursement from the estate of a deceased Medicaid beneficiary for services provided.
When Does Medicaid Estate Recovery Apply?
In New Jersey, Medicaid Estate Recovery applies in the following cases:
- Age 55 and Older: Medicaid benefits provided to individuals aged 55 or older are subject to estate recovery. This typically includes expenses related to nursing home care, home and community-based services, and other long-term care costs.
What Assets Are Subject to Recovery?
The state can only recover from assets that are part of the deceased’s probate estate. In New Jersey, this includes assets owned in the individual’s name at the time of death, such as:
- Real property (e.g., a home)
- Bank accounts
- Investments
Assets held jointly, in a trust, or designated with a beneficiary (like life insurance) may not be subject to recovery or recovery may be delayed, depending on the structure of ownership.
Are There Any Exceptions?
- Hardship Waivers: Families may apply for a hardship waiver if estate recovery would create significant financial hardship for survivors.
- Surviving Spouse: Recovery is deferred until the death of the Medicaid recipient’s surviving spouse.
- Dependent Family Members: If the deceased has a surviving child under age 21, or a blind or disabled child of any age recovery is postponed.
- Home Exemptions: If an adult child lived in the home and provided care that delayed the need for Medicaid benefits, the home may be exempt from recovery.
How to Protect Assets from Medicaid Estate Recovery
There are legal strategies to safeguard assets, but they require careful planning well in advance:
- Creating Trusts: Irrevocable trusts can shield assets from probate and Medicaid recovery.
- Gifting Assets: Transferring assets to family members or others, while adhering to Medicaid’s 5-year look back period rules, can minimize exposure.
- Joint Ownership: Structuring assets as jointly owned with right of survivorship can limit probate exposure.
- Exempt Transfers: Some transfers of assets are exempt from Medicaid’s 5-year look back.
Conclusion
These rules are complicated and confusing, even for the average attorney. It is essential to consult with an attorney who specializes in elder law to explore these strategies and implementing a plan that complies with both federal and your state’s Medicaid regulations.